ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To screen methylations of CpG islands in prostate cancer using restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The DNA was extracted from homogeneous cells captured by laser capture microdissection in 20 prostate cancer and 18 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissues for scanning the CpG islands using RLGS. The methylation status of each CpG island was compared between the cancer and BPH samples to screen the genes involved in prostate cancer development. The screened genes were uploaded to DAVID database for GO analysis, and the genes with the most significant methylation were analyzed by pyrosequencing.</p><p><b>RESULTS AND CONCLUSION</b>Among all the tested CpG islands, 10245 (37.2%) in prostate cancer and 8658 (30.3%) in BPH samples were found to be abnormally methylated, and >60% of the methylated CpG islands were in the promoter region. Compared with BPH samples, the prostate cancer samples showed differential methyation in 735 CpG islands, including 458 hepermethyated and 256 hypomethelated ones. Seven genes (DPYS, P16, APC, GSTP1, TMEM122, RARB, and ARHGAP20) in prostate cancer were identified to have distinct methylations. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that these genes were associated with several biomolecular and biological processes, and among them DPYS gene was involved in 13 GO anotated biologic functions, development of 50 diseases and 47 protein interactions. Pyrosequencing of 7 sites of the CPG island in DPYS gene showed a methylation frequency of 32.7%, suggesting the importance of DPYS gene in the carcinogenesis and progression of prostate cancer.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , CpG Islands , DNA Methylation , DNA, Neoplasm , Genetics , Genomics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms , Diagnosis , GeneticsABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the safety, feasibility and efficacy of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in the treatment of renal tumors with R. E. N. A. L score more than 7.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data were collected from 62 patients undergoing transperitoneal LPN (32 cases) and retroperitoneal LPN (30 cases) for a complex renal mass (R.E.N.A.L. score≥7) between January 2012 and March 2014. The surgical and early postoperative outcomes and complications were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments. The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, surgical complications, blood transfusion rate, tolerating regular diet time, postoperative hospital stay and surgical margin were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The operations were completed successfully in all cases except for 1 case in transperitoneal group and 3 in retroperitoneal group that required conversion to open surgery. No significant differences were found in age, body mass index, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor size or R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (P>0.05), nor in estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, intraoperative complication, blood transfusion rate or surgical margin between the two groups (P>0.05, respectively). The transperitoneal LPN group had a shorter mean operative time than retroperitoneal LPN group (210.4∓59.2 vs 252∓58.3 min, P<0.05) but showed longer tolerating regular diet time (47∓10 h vs 23∓6 h, P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay time (8.4∓1.9 days vs 6.5∓1.6 days, P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Both transperitoneal LPN and retroperitoneal LPN are safe, feasible and effective for surgical management of complex localized tumors, but the transperitoneal procedure offers larger operative space with better exposure; the retroperitoneal procedure better promotes postoperative recovery of the patients.</p>